User talk:GameProducer

February 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 03:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, GameProducer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

NuclearWarfare

Again, welcome! NuclearWarfare _(Talk) 03:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roger E. Pedersen

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Roger E. Pedersen, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mobygames.com/user/sheet/userSheetId,25684. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

{Your recent addition to Game Design Foundations 2nd Edition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MuZemike 19:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roger E. Pedersen

A tag has been placed on Roger E. Pedersen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MuZemike 19:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Game Design Foundations, Second Edition

A tag has been placed on Game Design Foundations, Second Edition, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Game Design Foundations, Second Edition and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Game Design Foundations, Second Edition. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Roger E. Pedersen?

If you are him or closely associated with Roger E. Pedersen please be aware that you may be editing under a conflict of interest and this is against Wikipedia's policies. -- œ ^™ 05:11, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COIN

You have been reported to the conflict of interest noticeboard in regards to the actions that you have made regarding the articles that you have edited. It is clear that you are editing under a name off-wiki, and that I think you are representing the IGDA in an attempt to promote the user whom you are editing. Thank you, MuZemike 05:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]